$34 trillion? Unimpressive.
Every time the gargantuan national debt trips a round number, there’s a flurry of attention before we get back to borrowing and spending more. The national debt recently hit $34 trillion for the first time ever, prompting concerned Americans to look at each other with arched eyebrows and say, really?
But $34 trillion, honestly, is nothing. By Election Day, 10 months from now, the US national debt will be at least $35 trillion, which is a rounder number than $34 trillion since it’s halfway between $30 trillion and $40 trillion. After that, it will rise by a couple trillion dollars per year, unless somebody does anything about it (hahaha).
By the time the next president leaves office in 2029, the national debt will almost certainly be more than $40 trillion, and approaching $50 trillion if there’s a recession along the way or anything else that cuts into revenue or requires fiscal stimulus.
How much is too much? Nobody really knows when the national debt will get so large that it suffocates the US economy, but it’s probably a safe bet than the current $34 trillion in debt is too much, and that $50 trillion will definitely be too much.
Some economists think the debt crisis budget hawks have been predicting for years has finally arrived. Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi recently told Yahoo Finance “we’re here” when asked if the public debt crisis has finally arrived. “I worry at some point we may see a freezing up of the Treasury market,” Zandi said.
Between last summer and fall, long-term interest rates rose by more than expected given market conditions, including the end of the Federal Reserve’s short-term rate-hiking cycle last July. One likely explanation was an excessive supply of US Treasury securities entering the market as needed to finance government spending. The Treasury Department has since modified the mix of securities it auctions to address what it thinks were market concerns.
Drop Rick Newman a note, follow him on Twitter, or sign up for his newsletter.
But nobody should assume the problem is fixed and there won’t be future disruptions in which there simply isn’t enough market demand for the massive amount of US government debt flooding into markets. If demand for debt falls short, lenders have to pay more via a higher interest rate, and the rate on US government bonds broadly determines the rates of every other type of consumer and business loan. So a real debt crisis would involve rising rates for mortgages, car loans, and everything else, plus the growth slowdown or contraction that normally comes with it.
There’s a double whammy for US taxpayers: Rising interest costs make the debt problem even worse, since the government would have to pay more to borrow on an ever-expanding pool of debt. The United States now pays about as much in interest on the debt every year as it pays to fund the entire Pentagon, and that will gradually get worse.
So who is doing something about this? Precisely nobody. As a rule of thumb, reducing deficits and getting the overall debt down to more manageable levels is doable, given two things: spending cuts and tax increases that will end the free ride many taxpayers have been getting from a government that is much more generous than its revenue would ordinarily allow.
Spending cuts don’t have to be draconian, but there will need to be changes to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security involving benefits cuts for wealthier people, higher retirement ages, paradigm changes for younger taxpayers, and other limits. Taxes will have to go up, first on wealthy Americans and then perhaps on lower earners. A federal value-added tax, similar to a national sales tax, would raise a lot of revenue quickly. Voters are not going to like it and politicians know it.
President Biden has a plan, of sorts, to address the problem, largely by raising taxes on businesses and the wealthy. But Biden couldn’t get anything like that through Congress during his first two years in office, when fellow Democrats controlled both houses of Congress. If Biden wins reelection, maybe he’ll dust off this plan during the second half of his second term and see if there might be more appetite for tax hikes.
Republicans in the House of Representatives are making a big deal about cutting spending, and they might even shut down some or all of the government in coming weeks to make their point. But they’re playing small ball, by addressing programs funded year by year that account for less than half of all spending. They’re not touching the biggest programs, including Medicare, Social Security, and defense.
Donald Trump, the likely GOP presidential nominee in 2024, doesn’t have a plan, either. He famously calls himself the “king of debt” and he wants to cut taxes even more than he did in the 2017 tax cut law he signed. Back then, Trump and other Republicans promised that lower taxes would actually create more tax revenue because they’d stimulate economic growth. That trickle-down logic has always been a myth, but that probably won’t stop Trump from tapping it again as he conjures the magic of ever-lower taxes.
Voters, for their part, are disgusted with America’s fiscal follies — but that doesn’t make them willing to shoulder tax hikes or benefit cuts. So onward we trundle, until the mushrooming national debt finally hits a number the markets can’t live with, whether round or not.
Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Twitter at @rickjnewman.
Click here for politics news related to business and money
Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance